Today was the first day of the Apologetics class for the 2017/2018 year. We started off this year by watching a video entitled Cold Case Christianity by J. Warner Wallace:
Here is the note-taking form I handed out:
Cold Case Christianity – J. Warner Wallace
- Warner Wallace was a committed a____________ until the age of 35 years old.
- I want to help you to process through evidential claims.
- There are some similarities between what we use to examine cold cases and what we use to examine the Christian worldview:
- Event in the distant p___________
- No living e__________________
- Little or no forensic e_____________
- Cases must be built on convincing c_________________ evidence
- Important to understand the difference between “what’s p____________” and “what’s a r_____________________” inference from circumstantial case.
- Eyewitness testimony is considered “direct evidence”
- Circumstantial evidence is “indirect evidence”
- It’s not “beyond a possible doubt”, we’re asking people to make a decision “beyond a reasonable doubt”
- Judges tell jurors all the time that they are not to consider “circumstantial evidence” as less v________d than “direct evidence”.
- Reason why circumstantial case better than a direct case: witnesses want to l______ sometimes
- Circumstantial evidence does not intentionally lie to you.
- Christianity built on direct evidence – how do we test the witnesses? 4 categories
- Were the witnesses even th________ to begin with?
- Are the witnesses supported ex______________?
- Have they been h___________ and accurate in the past?
- Do the witnesses have an ulterior m______________?
- If they pass in these 4 categories, we’re to consider them reliable. Can we assess the apostles in the same way?
- Were they p___________? If someone’s not there, they can’t be your suspect (or your witness)
- Destruction of t___________ in 70 AD is not included in the book of Acts
- Siege of J_____________ 69 AD is not included in the book of Acts
- P_________ Martyred (64-67 AD) is not included in the book of Acts (P_________ too)
- J___________ Martyred (61 AD) is not included in the book of Acts
- Most important players in book of Acts – author doesn’t say anything about their deaths
- Luke writes Acts 60 AD, Luke writes the Gospel of Luke (53 AD)
- Paul quotes Luke’s Gospel in several places
- Mark writes Gospel (45-50 AD)
- Were they v__________________ (corroborated)?
- Outside sources – Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, etc.
- Internal evidence
- Archeology
- Were they h______________?
- If your story is changing over time, there’s a good chance I shouldn’t trust you.
- Chain of custody (of evidence over time) – Polaroid (snapshot) of evidence at various points in time. You can verify that it didn’t change.
- John –>Ignatius, Papias, Polycarp –> Irenaeus –> Hippolytus
- Paul –> Linus –> Clement –> Evaristus –> Alexander –> Sixtus –> Telesphorus –> Pius –> Justin Martyr –> Tatian
- Peter –> Mark –> Anianus –> Avillus –> Kedron –> Primus –> Justus –> Pantaenus –> Clement –> Origen –> Pamphilus –> Eusebius
- 3 different locations (Rome, Ephesus, North Africa) – couldn’t coordinate w/each other
- If you lost all the o_________ d____________ from the biblical authors and all you had were other non-biblical writings from the 1st century chain of custody, what would you know about Jesus? He Was Born of a Virgin, Worked Miracles, Preached Sermons, Claimed to be God, Worshipped as God, Crucified and Buried, Rose from the Dead, Ascended into Heaven, Through Whom in Faith Alone you are Saved.
- Were they b_____________? Bias is driven by motive. There are only 3 motives behind any homicide or behind anything you’ve done wrong in your life: 1. Financial G________, 2. Sexual L________, 3. Pursuit of P___________.
- The 12 apostles suffered and died for what they saw and reported
- No 1st century evidence that any of 12 are reported to have recanted their testimony.
- All died without financial success
- The vast majority died alone
- All were persecuted for their position
- Matthew, didn’t start off with bias, he ended up with a conviction based on observation
- Can we t___________ what the scriptures say? The Gospel Accounts Are Reliable:
- T_______________? The Gospel Writers Were Present
- V_______________? The Gospel Writers Were Corroborated
- A_______________? The Gospels Were Accurately Delivered
- A_______________? The Gospel Writers Had No Ulterior Motive
- You’re trying to discover whether something supernatural exists – you don’t begin that investigation by r________________ the supernatural.
- If you’re a “1 decision Christian” (decided to trust Christ), why haven’t you taken the additional step to learn this so that your Christianity won’t be “a_______________”?
Discussion Questions
- How are Cold Case Homicide investigations similar to investigating the evidence for Christianity?
- Why should we think that the Gospel writers were early enough to be eyewitnesses? Why is that important?
- What is the “Chain of Custody” and how is this relevant to the Bible?
- How would the different locations of John, Peter and Paul (thousands of miles apart) lend credence to the reliability of their individual writings?
- Did a church council in 363 AD determine which books were in the Bible?
- By what 3 motives could we evaluate eyewitnesses (including the biblical authors) to see if they might be lying?
- Why is the distinction between what’s “possible” and “reasonable” so important in determining the truth in evidential cases?